Hastings constitutional law quarterly

404 papers and 666 indexed citations i.

About

The 404 papers published in Hastings constitutional law quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 666 indexed citations. Papers published in Hastings constitutional law quarterly usually cover Political Science and International Relations (209 papers), Law (140 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (128 papers) specifically the topics of Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (118 papers), Law, Rights, and Freedoms (86 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (69 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Hastings constitutional law quarterly are Amy Stuart Wells, Michael A. Olivas, David S. Clark, Rebecca Marcus, Pnina Lahav, Glenn Harlan Reynolds, Kathleen S. Kelly, Kevin G. Welner, Neil Gotanda and Edward P. Richards.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Hastings constitutional law quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Hastings constitutional law quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Hastings constitutional law quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Hastings constitutional law quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Hastings constitutional law quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Hastings constitutional law quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hastings constitutional law quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025