Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica

698 papers and 743 indexed citations i.

About

The 698 papers published in Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica in the last decades have received a total of 743 indexed citations. Papers published in Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica usually cover Anthropology (359 papers), Archeology (239 papers) and Philosophy (112 papers) specifically the topics of Classical Antiquity Studies (355 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (131 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (98 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica are Bruno Gentili, Claude Calame, John Van Sickle, Leslie Kurke, Vincent J. Rosivach, Charles Segal, David Cohen, David Sider, Alan Griffiths and Jenny Strauss Clay.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica.

Countries where authors publish in Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quaderni Urbinati di Cultura Classica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025