Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain

823 papers and 8.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 823 papers published in Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain in the last decades have received a total of 8.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain usually cover Pharmacology (392 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (365 papers) and Cell Biology (312 papers) specifically the topics of Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (385 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (351 papers) and Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (299 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain are David Simons, Chang‐Zern Hong, I. Jon Russell, Gwendolen Jull, Robert D. Gerwin, Howard Vernon, Andrew A. Fischer, Siegfried Mense, Ian D. Coulter and Robert M. Bennett.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025