Die Rehabilitation

945 papers and 5.5k indexed citations

About

The 945 papers published in Die Rehabilitation in the last decades have received a total of 5.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Die Rehabilitation usually cover Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (615 papers), General Health Professions (524 papers) and Clinical Psychology (224 papers) specifically the topics of Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (614 papers), Health and Medical Studies (402 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (205 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Die Rehabilitation are Markus Wirtz, Hermann Faller, Matthias Bethge, Marco Streibelt, W. H. Jäckel, H. Raspe, Christian Zwingmann, Oskar Mittag, R. Deck and Heiner Raspe.

In The Last Decade

Die Rehabilitation

826 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Fields of papers published in Die Rehabilitation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Die Rehabilitation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Die Rehabilitation.

Countries where authors publish in Die Rehabilitation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Die Rehabilitation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Die Rehabilitation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Die Rehabilitation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026