Journal of Mathematical Logic

263 papers and 2.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 263 papers published in Journal of Mathematical Logic in the last decades have received a total of 2.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Mathematical Logic usually cover Geometry and Topology (216 papers), Computational Theory and Mathematics (179 papers) and Mathematical Physics (115 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Topology and Set Theory (206 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (153 papers) and Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (50 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Mathematical Logic are Itay Ben-Yaacov, W. Hugh Woodin, Rami Grossberg, Monica VanDieren, Hans H. Adler, Menachem Magidor, Anand Pillay, Matthew Foreman, James Cummings and Justin Tatch Moore.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Mathematical Logic

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Mathematical Logic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Mathematical Logic.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Mathematical Logic

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Mathematical Logic. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Mathematical Logic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Mathematical Logic more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025