Journal of Legal Medicine

783 papers and 6.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 783 papers published in Journal of Legal Medicine in the last decades have received a total of 6.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Legal Medicine usually cover Pharmacy (198 papers), General Health Professions (178 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (118 papers) specifically the topics of Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (196 papers), Ethics in medical practice (77 papers) and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Medical Decision-Making (69 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Legal Medicine are Marshall B. Kapp, Marshall B. Kapp, Arnold J. Rosoff, Melissa Steward, L. Ivan Epstein, Micah L. Berman, Jack W. Snyder, Sana Loue, Ross D. Silverman and Stephanie L. Anderson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Legal Medicine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Legal Medicine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Legal Medicine.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Legal Medicine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Legal Medicine. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Legal Medicine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Legal Medicine more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025