Journal of Access Services

370 papers and 1.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 370 papers published in Journal of Access Services in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Access Services usually cover Information Systems (196 papers), Library and Information Sciences (149 papers) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (24 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Information Literacy (123 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (112 papers) and Web and Library Services (104 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Access Services are Mark Sanders, Denise Hersey, Axel Schmetzke, Fred W. Smith, JJ Pionke, E.A. Draffan, Barbara Blummer, Janet B. Croft, Stephen C. Brown and Vincent Larivière.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Access Services

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Access Services. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Access Services.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Access Services

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Access Services. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Access Services with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Access Services more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025