Journal of Ovarian Research

1.7k papers and 29.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Journal of Ovarian Research in the last decades have received a total of 29.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Ovarian Research usually cover Reproductive Medicine (977 papers), Molecular Biology (612 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (530 papers) specifically the topics of Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (537 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (494 papers) and Ovarian function and disorders (420 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Ovarian Research are Raoul Orvieto, Sham S. Kakar, Zatollah Asemi, Deepa Bhartiya, Wen Di, Rana Shafabakhsh, Benjamin K. Tsang, Yumei Li, Fangfang He and Aziz Aris.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Ovarian Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Ovarian Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Ovarian Research.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Ovarian Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Ovarian Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Ovarian Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Ovarian Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025