Journal for Nurses in Staff Development

8.8k citations
675 papers · · active since 1993

Impact in

Papers in

Journal for Nurses in Staff Development

636 papers receiving 7.6k citations

Peers

Journal for Nurses in Staff Development
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Research and Theory 3.7k
  • Leadership and Management 1.6k
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 236
  • General Health Professions 1.7k
  • Emergency Medical Services 381
Replace International Journal of Nursing Sciences with:
International Journal of Nursing Sciences China
Australian journal of advanced nursing Australia
Journal for Nurses in Professional Development United States
Nursing Research and Practice United States
Journal of Nursing Research Taiwan
International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship United States
Asian Nursing Research South Korea
Nurse Researcher United Kingdom
Japan Journal of Nursing Science Japan
OJIN The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing United States
Journal for Nurses in Staff Development relative to International Journal of Nursing Sciences China International Journal of Nursing Sciences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.8×
International Journal of Nursing Sciences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal for Nurses in Staff Development

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal for Nurses in Staff Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal for Nurses in Staff Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal for Nurses in Staff Development more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal for Nurses in Staff Development

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal for Nurses in Staff Development. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal for Nurses in Staff Development.

About Journal for Nurses in Staff Development

The 675 papers published in Journal for Nurses in Staff Development in the last decades have received a total of 8.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal for Nurses in Staff Development usually cover Research and Theory (323 papers), Leadership and Management (119 papers), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (31 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (225 papers) and General Health Professions (134 papers) specifically the topics of Nursing education and management (323 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (213 papers), Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues (119 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (81 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (30 papers), Competency Development and Evaluation (27 papers), Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (20 papers) and Health Education and Validation (20 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal for Nurses in Staff Development are Marilyn E. Asselin, Olive J. Yonge, Mary T. Hickey, Florence Myrick, Anna M. McDaniel, Mary E. Krugman, Cathleen A. Krsek, Genevieve E. Chandler, Mary Theresa Schoessler and Colleen O’Leary-Kelley.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact