Journal of Library Metadata

214 papers and 958 indexed citations i.

About

The 214 papers published in Journal of Library Metadata in the last decades have received a total of 958 indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Library Metadata usually cover Information Systems (165 papers), Artificial Intelligence (71 papers) and Conservation (67 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Information Systems (95 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (65 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (57 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Library Metadata are Mohammad Yasser Chuttur, Jian Qin, Timothy W. Cole, Jane Greenberg, Diane Rasmussen Pennington, Ixchel M. Faniel, Elizabeth Yakel, Jung‐ran Park, Dong Joon Lee and Besiki Stvilia.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Library Metadata

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Library Metadata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Library Metadata.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Library Metadata

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Library Metadata. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Library Metadata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Library Metadata more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025