Journal of Library Metadata

1.4k citations
230 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Digital and Traditional Archives Management
    • Library Science and Information Systems
    • Research Data Management Practices
    • Digital Rights Management and Security

Papers in

    • Digital and Traditional Archives Management 71
    • Library Science and Information Systems 99
    • Research Data Management Practices 61
    • Digital Rights Management and Security 34

Journal of Library Metadata

203 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Journal of Library Metadata
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Conservation 336
  • Information Systems 917
  • Library and Information Sciences 46
  • Information Systems and Management 200
  • Management Science and Operations Research 259
Replace New Review of Information Networking with:
New Review of Information Networking United Kingdom
Journal of Electronic Publishing United States
Digital Library Perspectives United States
Journal of Archival Organization United States
Journal of Map & Geography Libraries United States
Archives and Manuscripts Australia
Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association Australia
Journal of Data and Information Science China
African Journal of Library Archives and Information Science Nigeria
Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services United States
Journal of Library Metadata relative to New Review of Information Networking United Kingdom New Review of Information Networking's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
New Review of Information Networking · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Library Metadata

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Library Metadata. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Library Metadata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Library Metadata more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Library Metadata

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Library Metadata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Library Metadata.

About Journal of Library Metadata

The 230 papers published in Journal of Library Metadata in the last decades have received a total of 1.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Library Metadata usually cover Conservation (73 papers), Information Systems (172 papers), Information Systems and Management (28 papers), Space and Planetary Science (4 papers) and Library and Information Sciences (4 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Information Systems (99 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (71 papers), Research Data Management Practices (61 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (60 papers), Digital Rights Management and Security (34 papers), Data Quality and Management (31 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (27 papers) and Digital Humanities and Scholarship (27 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Library Metadata are Mohammad Yasser Chuttur, Oksana L. Zavalina, Jian Qin, Jane Greenberg, Timothy W. Cole, Manolis Gergatsoulis, Heather Lea Moulaison, Diane Rasmussen Pennington, Elizabeth Yakel and Dong Joon Lee.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact