Journal of Library Metadata

1.3k citations
228 papers · · active since 1997

Impact in

    • Library Science and Information Systems
    • Research Data Management Practices
    • Library Science and Information
    • Web and Library Services
    • Digital and Traditional Archives Management

Papers in

    • Library Science and Information Systems 198
    • Research Data Management Practices 30
    • Library Science and Information 24
    • Web and Library Services 10
    • Digital and Traditional Archives Management 24

Journal of Library Metadata

206 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Journal of Library Metadata
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Information Systems 1k
  • Conservation 152
  • Library and Information Sciences 57
  • Artificial Intelligence 180
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 40
Replace New Review of Information Networking with:
New Review of Information Networking United Kingdom
Journal of Map & Geography Libraries United States
Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services United States
Digital Library Perspectives United States
Journal of Web Librarianship United States
Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association Australia
Journal of Information Ethics United States
Journal of Information Policy United States
Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship United States
Journal of Electronic Publishing United States
Journal of Library Metadata relative to New Review of Information Networking United Kingdom New Review of Information Networking's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
New Review of Information Networking · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Library Metadata

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Library Metadata. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Library Metadata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Library Metadata more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Journal of Library Metadata

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Library Metadata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Library Metadata.

About Journal of Library Metadata

The 228 papers published in Journal of Library Metadata in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Library Metadata usually cover Information Systems (215 papers), Conservation (24 papers), Artificial Intelligence (20 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (9 papers) and Management Information Systems (4 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Information Systems (198 papers), Research Data Management Practices (30 papers), Library Science and Information (24 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (24 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (18 papers), Web and Library Services (10 papers), Digital Humanities and Scholarship (9 papers) and Optics and Image Analysis (4 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Library Metadata are Mohammad Yasser Chuttur, Oksana L. Zavalina, Jian Qin, Jane Greenberg, Timothy W. Cole, Sarah J. Carrier, Manolis Gergatsoulis, Jung‐ran Park, Ixchel M. Faniel and Elizabeth Yakel.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact