Library philosophy and practice

10.4k citations
1.7k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

    • Library Science and Information Literacy 595
    • Library Science and Administration 320
    • Web and Library Services 246
    • Library Collection Development and Digital Resources 206
    • ICT in Developing Communities 87

Library philosophy and practice

1.4k papers receiving 7.9k citations

Peers

Library philosophy and practice
Comparison fields: 5 of 184
  • Library and Information Sciences 3.0k
  • Information Systems 3.9k
  • Information Systems and Management 1.2k
  • Communication 943
  • Computer Science Applications 529
Replace The International Information & Library Review with:
The International Information & Library Review United States
Library Review United Kingdom
Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication United States
Information Research United States
Journal of Education for Library and Information Science United States
Libri United States
Journal of Librarianship and Information Science United Kingdom
Journal of Library Administration United States
Library Management United Kingdom
IFLA Journal United States
Library philosophy and practice relative to The International Information & Library Review United States The International Information & Library Review's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
The International Information & Library Review · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Library philosophy and practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Library philosophy and practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Library philosophy and practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Library philosophy and practice more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Library philosophy and practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Library philosophy and practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Library philosophy and practice.

About Library philosophy and practice

The 1.7k papers published in Library philosophy and practice in the last decades have received a total of 10.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Library philosophy and practice usually cover Library and Information Sciences (676 papers), Information Systems (669 papers), Communication (106 papers), Information Systems and Management (84 papers) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (84 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Information Literacy (595 papers), Library Science and Administration (320 papers), Web and Library Services (246 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (206 papers), African Education and Politics (102 papers), Online and Blended Learning (90 papers), ICT in Developing Communities (87 papers) and scientometrics and bibliometrics research (82 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Library philosophy and practice are Funmilola Olubunmi Omotayo, Sunday Olanrewaju Popoola, S. Thanuskodi, Rubina Bhatti, Adeyinka Tella, Khalid M. Mahmood, Constant Okello‐Obura, Esharenana E. Adomi, Farzana Shafique and Margam Madhusudhan.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact