This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Parenting. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Parenting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Parenting more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Parenting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Parenting.
About Parenting
The 464 papers published in Parenting in the last decades have received a total of 17.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Parenting usually cover Clinical Psychology (307 papers), Pharmacy (51 papers), Social Psychology (165 papers), Demography (77 papers) and Education (144 papers) specifically the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (282 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (124 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (101 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (77 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (70 papers), Infant Health and Development (51 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (49 papers) and Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (47 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Parenting are Mark Ethan Feinberg, Marc H. Bornstein, Ruth Feldman, Daniela Teubert, Martin Pinquart, Rachel Seginer, Thomas G. Power, Jeanne Brooks‐Gunn, Esther M. Leerkes and Robert H. Bradley.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.