Countries where authors publish in Journal of Carcinogenesis
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Carcinogenesis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Carcinogenesis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Carcinogenesis more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Carcinogenesis
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Carcinogenesis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Carcinogenesis.
About Journal of Carcinogenesis
The 268 papers published in Journal of Carcinogenesis in the last decades have received a total of 9.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Journal of Carcinogenesis usually cover Cancer Research (44 papers), Oncology (59 papers), Otorhinolaryngology (6 papers), Microbiology (1 paper) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (19 papers) specifically the topics of Cancer-related Molecular Pathways (11 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (10 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (10 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (9 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (9 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (8 papers), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (8 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (8 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Carcinogenesis are Haseeb Ahsan, Gulam Waris, Takuji Tanaka, Idrees Mian, D. J. Tindall, Peter Eoin Lonergan, Lauren Carcas, Ravi Salgia, Neelu Puri and Cansu Karakaş.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.