Japanese Studies

559 papers and 1.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 559 papers published in Japanese Studies in the last decades have received a total of 1.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Japanese Studies usually cover Cultural Studies (290 papers), Sociology and Political Science (215 papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (56 papers) specifically the topics of Japanese History and Culture (272 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (91 papers) and Chinese history and philosophy (66 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Japanese Studies are Kōichi Iwabuchi, Tessa Morris‐Suzuki, Romit Dasgupta, Carolyn S. Stevens, Anthony J. Liddicoat, Takashi Terada, Hirofumi Katsuno, Nanette Gottlieb, Purnendra Jain and Vera Mackie.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Japanese Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Japanese Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Japanese Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Japanese Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Japanese Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Japanese Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Japanese Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025