Wool technology and sheep breeding

524 papers and 1.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 524 papers published in Wool technology and sheep breeding in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Wool technology and sheep breeding usually cover Genetics (114 papers), Polymers and Plastics (81 papers) and Agronomy and Crop Science (41 papers) specifically the topics of Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (105 papers), Textile materials and evaluations (81 papers) and Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers (32 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Wool technology and sheep breeding are LR Piper, Roberta Bencini, HN Turner, H. W. Raadsma, RR Woolaston, Robert Banks, DJ Cottle, D. J. Brown, KD Atkins and RW Ponzoni.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Wool technology and sheep breeding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Wool technology and sheep breeding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Wool technology and sheep breeding.

Countries where authors publish in Wool technology and sheep breeding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Wool technology and sheep breeding. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Wool technology and sheep breeding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wool technology and sheep breeding more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025