Intersecciones en antropología

330 papers and 1.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 330 papers published in Intersecciones en antropología in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Intersecciones en antropología usually cover Anthropology (190 papers), Archeology (143 papers) and Paleontology (117 papers) specifically the topics of Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (127 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (105 papers) and Archaeological and Geological Studies (90 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Intersecciones en antropología are Luis Alberto Borrero, Verónica Isabel Williams, Karen Borrazzo, Robert L. Kelly, Pablo G. Messineo, Michael Shott, Charles R. Stern, Gustavo Flensborg, Valeria Cortegoso and Martín H. Fugassa.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Intersecciones en antropología

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Intersecciones en antropología. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Intersecciones en antropología.

Countries where authors publish in Intersecciones en antropología

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Intersecciones en antropología. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Intersecciones en antropología with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Intersecciones en antropología more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025