International Sociology

1.2k papers and 21.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in International Sociology in the last decades have received a total of 21.3k indexed citations. Papers published in International Sociology usually cover Sociology and Political Science (747 papers), Political Science and International Relations (306 papers) and Gender Studies (97 papers) specifically the topics of Social and Cultural Dynamics (100 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (88 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (68 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Sociology are Aníbal Quijano, Julia Evetts, Asef Bayat, John W. Meyer, Benoît Rihoux, Orlando Fals-Borda, George Ritzer, Seymour Martin Lipset, Terry Nichols Clark and Amalia Sa’ar.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in International Sociology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Sociology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Sociology.

Countries where authors publish in International Sociology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Sociology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Sociology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Sociology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025