Review of World Economics

1.1k papers and 22.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Review of World Economics in the last decades have received a total of 22.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Review of World Economics usually cover General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (844 papers), Economics and Econometrics (694 papers) and Strategy and Management (352 papers) specifically the topics of Global trade and economics (607 papers), International Business and FDI (239 papers) and Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (226 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Review of World Economics are Joachim Wagner, Alan M. Rugman, Thierry Mayer, Marius Brülhart, David Greenaway, Fukunari Kimura, Peter Nunnenkamp, Kamal Abdelrahman, Keith Head and Aida Caldera.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Review of World Economics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Review of World Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Review of World Economics.

Countries where authors publish in Review of World Economics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Review of World Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Review of World Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review of World Economics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025