International Journal of Aromatherapy

216 papers and 3.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 216 papers published in International Journal of Aromatherapy in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in International Journal of Aromatherapy usually cover Food Science (63 papers), Sensory Systems (54 papers) and Plant Science (51 papers) specifically the topics of Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (62 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (54 papers) and Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (21 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of Aromatherapy are Richard E. Harris, Alexander Pauli, Mouhssen Lahlou, S Inouye, Jonathan D. Geiger, Vikas Rana, Richard Harris, L. Williams, Yuka Saeki and Dahmane Dahmane.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in International Journal of Aromatherapy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Aromatherapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Aromatherapy.

Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Aromatherapy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Aromatherapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Aromatherapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Aromatherapy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025