Countries where authors publish in Finance & development
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Finance & development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Finance & development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Finance & development more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Finance & development
This network shows the impact of papers published in Finance & development. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Finance & development.
About Finance & development
The 599 papers published in Finance & development in the last decades have received a total of 5.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Finance & development usually cover Development (25 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (46 papers), Finance (52 papers), Economics and Econometrics (89 papers) and Accounting (27 papers) specifically the topics of Global Financial Crisis and Policies (39 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (33 papers), International Development and Aid (25 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (19 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (19 papers), Global trade and economics (14 papers), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (13 papers) and State Capitalism and Financial Governance (13 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Finance & development are Hernando de Soto, Ajay Chhibber, Cheryl W. Gray, Daniel J. Kaufman, Zamir Iqbal, Daniel Kaufmann, Paolo Mauro, Gregory K. Ingram, Christine Kessides and Joel S. Hellman.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.