Integrative Organismal Biology

234 papers and 1.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 234 papers published in Integrative Organismal Biology in the last decades have received a total of 1.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Integrative Organismal Biology usually cover Ecology (83 papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (66 papers) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (62 papers) specifically the topics of Animal Behavior and Reproduction (43 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (41 papers) and Ichthyology and Marine Biology (34 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Integrative Organismal Biology are Ignacio T. Moore, Scott A. MacDougall‐Shackleton, L. Michael Romero, Frances Bonier, Martha M. Muñoz, Brooke L. Bodensteiner, Mackenzie E. Gerringer, Ryan N. Felice, Anne‐Claire Fabre and Carla Bardua.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Integrative Organismal Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Integrative Organismal Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Integrative Organismal Biology.

Countries where authors publish in Integrative Organismal Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Integrative Organismal Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Integrative Organismal Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Integrative Organismal Biology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025