ACM Transactions on Information Systems

83.9k citations
1.4k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Recommender Systems and Techniques
    • Web Data Mining and Analysis
    • Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
    • Topic Modeling
    • Semantic Web and Ontologies
    • Advanced Text Analysis Techniques

Papers in

    • Recommender Systems and Techniques 403
    • Information Retrieval and Search Behavior 191
    • Web Data Mining and Analysis 107
    • Topic Modeling 400
    • Advanced Graph Neural Networks 204
    • Natural Language Processing Techniques 125

ACM Transactions on Information Systems

1.3k papers receiving 75.9k citations

Peers

ACM Transactions on Information Systems
Comparison fields: 5 of 217
  • Information Systems 38.9k
  • Artificial Intelligence 40.2k
  • Human-Computer Interaction 6.9k
  • Signal Processing 9.3k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 15.1k
Replace IEEE Intelligent Systems with:
IEEE Intelligent Systems United States
IEEE Internet Computing United States
IBM Systems Journal United States
IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics - Part A Systems and Humans United States
IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials United States
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing United States
ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology China
Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery United States
AI Magazine United States
IEEE Security & Privacy United States
ACM Transactions on Information Systems relative to IEEE Intelligent Systems United States IEEE Intelligent Systems's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
IEEE Intelligent Systems · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in ACM Transactions on Information Systems

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ACM Transactions on Information Systems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ACM Transactions on Information Systems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ACM Transactions on Information Systems more than expected).

Fields of papers published in ACM Transactions on Information Systems

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ACM Transactions on Information Systems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ACM Transactions on Information Systems.

About ACM Transactions on Information Systems

The 1.4k papers published in ACM Transactions on Information Systems in the last decades have received a total of 83.9k indexed citations . Papers published in ACM Transactions on Information Systems usually cover Information Systems (755 papers), Artificial Intelligence (879 papers), Signal Processing (163 papers), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (241 papers) and Management Science and Operations Research (140 papers) specifically the topics of Recommender Systems and Techniques (403 papers), Topic Modeling (400 papers), Advanced Graph Neural Networks (204 papers), Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (191 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (136 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (125 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (122 papers) and Web Data Mining and Analysis (107 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ACM Transactions on Information Systems are Kalervo Järvelin, Jaana Kekäläinen, Joseph A. Konstan, John Riedl, Loren Terveen, Jonathan L. Herlocker, Thomas Hofmann, Hsinchun Chen, George Karypis and Mukund Deshpande.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact