Countries where authors publish in Innovative Surgical Sciences
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Innovative Surgical Sciences. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Innovative Surgical Sciences with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Innovative Surgical Sciences more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Innovative Surgical Sciences
This network shows the impact of papers published in Innovative Surgical Sciences. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Innovative Surgical Sciences.
About Innovative Surgical Sciences
The 191 papers published in Innovative Surgical Sciences in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Innovative Surgical Sciences usually cover Surgery (119 papers), Oncology (39 papers), Gender Studies (13 papers), Emergency Medicine (12 papers) and Hepatology (9 papers) specifically the topics of Surgical Simulation and Training (19 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (18 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (18 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (13 papers), Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (9 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (8 papers), Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (8 papers) and Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (8 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Innovative Surgical Sciences are W. Reinpold, Thomas Neumuth, Ferdinand Köckerling, Arved Weimann, S. Swaroop Vedula, Gregory D. Hager, H. Niebuhr, Ivo A. M. J. Broeders, B J M Hermans and Tobias Fritz.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.