Information Retrieval

24.2k citations
609 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
    • Web Data Mining and Analysis
    • Recommender Systems and Techniques
    • Topic Modeling
    • Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
    • Text and Document Classification Technologies
    • Natural Language Processing Techniques

Papers in

    • Information Retrieval and Search Behavior 220
    • Web Data Mining and Analysis 116
    • Recommender Systems and Techniques 68
    • Topic Modeling 188
    • Natural Language Processing Techniques 92
    • Text and Document Classification Technologies 73
    • Advanced Text Analysis Techniques 63
    • Semantic Web and Ontologies 63

Information Retrieval

558 papers receiving 20.8k citations

Peers

Information Retrieval
Comparison fields: 5 of 191
  • Information Systems 11.3k
  • Artificial Intelligence 15.9k
  • Signal Processing 2.6k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 4.8k
  • Computer Science Applications 956
Replace ACM Transactions on Internet Technology with:
ACM Transactions on Internet Technology United States
Computer Science Review India
Journal of Web Semantics Germany
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery United States
The Knowledge Engineering Review United Kingdom
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction United States
ACM Transactions on the Web United States
Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics United States
IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine China
International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems China
Information Retrieval relative to ACM Transactions on Internet Technology United States ACM Transactions on Internet Technology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
ACM Transactions on Internet Technology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Information Retrieval

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Information Retrieval. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Information Retrieval with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Information Retrieval more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Information Retrieval

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Information Retrieval. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Information Retrieval.

About Information Retrieval

The 609 papers published in Information Retrieval in the last decades have received a total of 24.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Information Retrieval usually cover Information Systems (354 papers), Artificial Intelligence (397 papers), Signal Processing (70 papers), Computer Science Applications (28 papers) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (89 papers) specifically the topics of Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (220 papers), Topic Modeling (188 papers), Web Data Mining and Analysis (116 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (92 papers), Text and Document Classification Technologies (73 papers), Recommender Systems and Techniques (68 papers), Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (63 papers) and Semantic Web and Ontologies (63 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Information Retrieval are Yiming Yang, Peter D. Turney, Elizabeth D. Liddy, Donna K. Harman, Dhruv Gupta, Ken Goldberg, C. Perkins, EDIE M. RASMUSSEN, William B. Frakes and Alistair Moffat.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact