Information Retrieval

610 papers and 14.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 610 papers published in Information Retrieval in the last decades have received a total of 14.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Information Retrieval usually cover Artificial Intelligence (396 papers), Information Systems (356 papers) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (88 papers) specifically the topics of Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (222 papers), Topic Modeling (186 papers) and Web Data Mining and Analysis (118 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Information Retrieval are Yiming Yang, Peter D. Turney, Elizabeth D. Liddy, Dhruv Gupta, Ken Goldberg, Thomas Roeder, C. Perkins, Donna Harman, Alistair Moffat and Edie Rasmussen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Information Retrieval

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Information Retrieval. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Information Retrieval.

Countries where authors publish in Information Retrieval

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Information Retrieval. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Information Retrieval with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Information Retrieval more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025