Industrial Archaeology Review

441 papers and 636 indexed citations i.

About

The 441 papers published in Industrial Archaeology Review in the last decades have received a total of 636 indexed citations. Papers published in Industrial Archaeology Review usually cover Anthropology (198 papers), Archeology (155 papers) and Paleontology (88 papers) specifically the topics of Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (183 papers), Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation (104 papers) and Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (88 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Industrial Archaeology Review are Marilyn Palmer, Randall H. McGuire, D. L. Dungworth, John Box, J. W. S. Hearle, D.G. Tucker, Sarah Tarlow, David Johnson, J. R. Harris and Richard Butterfield.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Industrial Archaeology Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Industrial Archaeology Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Industrial Archaeology Review.

Countries where authors publish in Industrial Archaeology Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Industrial Archaeology Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Industrial Archaeology Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Industrial Archaeology Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025