Voluntary Sector Review

335 papers and 2.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 335 papers published in Voluntary Sector Review in the last decades have received a total of 2.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Voluntary Sector Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (205 papers), Finance (100 papers) and Demography (59 papers) specifically the topics of Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (166 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (95 papers) and Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development (52 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Voluntary Sector Review are René Bekkers, Pamala Wiepking, Pete Alcock, Rob Macmillan, Gareth G. Morgan, Simon Teasdale, Beth Breeze, Stephen McKay, Domenico Moro and Malin Arvidson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Voluntary Sector Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Voluntary Sector Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Voluntary Sector Review.

Countries where authors publish in Voluntary Sector Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Voluntary Sector Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Voluntary Sector Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Voluntary Sector Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025