New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia

329 papers and 3.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 329 papers published in New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia in the last decades have received a total of 3.2k indexed citations. Papers published in New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia usually cover Information Systems (108 papers), Sociology and Political Science (103 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (87 papers) specifically the topics of Multimedia Communication and Technology (55 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (40 papers) and Recommender Systems and Techniques (27 papers). The most active scholars publishing in New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia are Paul De Bra, Raya Fidel, Kishonna L. Gray, Licia Calvi, Shaíley Minocha, Tony Walter, Peter Brusilovsky, Jonas Löwgren, Rich Gazan and Cécile Paris.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia.

Countries where authors publish in New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025