History of Philosophy Quarterly

1.7k citations
302 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Philosophy top 5%
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory
    • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy
    • Medieval Philosophy and Theology
    • Historical Philosophy and Science

Papers in

    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 56
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory 45
    • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought 34
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy 29
    • Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel 17
    • Medieval Philosophy and Theology 16
    • Historical Philosophy and Science 40

History of Philosophy Quarterly

172 papers receiving 786 citations

Peers

History of Philosophy Quarterly
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Philosophy 1.2k
  • History and Philosophy of Science 512
  • Anthropology 217
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 216
  • Political Science and International Relations 294
Replace Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung with:
Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung United States
Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy United States
Journal of the American Philosophical Association United States
Journal of the Philosophy of History United States
Oxford studies in ancient philosophy United States
Sententiae Ukraine
Quaestio France
RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA France
Revue philosophique de la France et de l étranger France
Oxford Literary Review United Kingdom
History of Philosophy Quarterly relative to Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung United States Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in History of Philosophy Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in History of Philosophy Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in History of Philosophy Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites History of Philosophy Quarterly more than expected).

Fields of papers published in History of Philosophy Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in History of Philosophy Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in History of Philosophy Quarterly.

About History of Philosophy Quarterly

The 302 papers published in History of Philosophy Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations . Papers published in History of Philosophy Quarterly usually cover Philosophy (179 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (66 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (30 papers), General Psychology (2 papers) and Religious studies (7 papers) specifically the topics of Classical Philosophy and Thought (56 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (45 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (40 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (34 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (29 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (25 papers), Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (17 papers) and Medieval Philosophy and Theology (16 papers). The most active scholars publishing in History of Philosophy Quarterly are Pauline Kleingeld, Daniel H. Frank, Jorge J. E. Gracia, Lara Denis, Alexander Nehamas, Vere Chappell, Petr Urban, Gerald J. Postema, Courtney D. Fugate and Donald Morrison.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact