Botanica Pacifica

235 papers and 692 indexed citations i.

About

The 235 papers published in Botanica Pacifica in the last decades have received a total of 692 indexed citations. Papers published in Botanica Pacifica usually cover Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (145 papers), Plant Science (128 papers) and Molecular Biology (34 papers) specifically the topics of Bryophyte Studies and Records (78 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (71 papers) and Lichen and fungal ecology (56 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Botanica Pacifica are Vadim A. Bakalin, Т. А. Остроумова, Elgene O. Box, Seung Se Choi, Kazue Fujiwara, Byung‐Yun Sun, H. Kauhanen, Gregory J. Retallack, Olga Yu. Pisarenko and Andrew M. Greller.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Botanica Pacifica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Botanica Pacifica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Botanica Pacifica.

Countries where authors publish in Botanica Pacifica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Botanica Pacifica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Botanica Pacifica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Botanica Pacifica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025