Countries where authors publish in Technology and Disability
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Technology and Disability. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Technology and Disability with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Technology and Disability more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Technology and Disability
This network shows the impact of papers published in Technology and Disability. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Technology and Disability.
About Technology and Disability
The 791 papers published in Technology and Disability in the last decades have received a total of 8.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Technology and Disability usually cover Occupational Therapy (289 papers), Human Factors and Ergonomics (77 papers), Human-Computer Interaction (76 papers), Rehabilitation (64 papers) and Demography (98 papers) specifically the topics of Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility (286 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (87 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (76 papers), Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (76 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (60 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (50 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (48 papers) and Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Technology and Disability are Louise Demers, Luc de Witte, Bernadette Ska, Rhoda Weiss‐Lambrou, Marion Hersh, Jeffrey W. Jutai, Marcia J. Scherer, Pier Luigi Emiliani, Hy Day and Denise Reid.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.