Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
529 papers
receiving
5.2k citations
Peers
Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
Comparison fields: 5 of 165
Demography1.0k
Health532
Economics and Econometrics1.8k
Gender Studies651
Sociology and Political Science2.7k
Replace European Journal of Sociology with:
European Journal of SociologyUnited States
Race & ClassUnited Kingdom
PoliticsUnited Kingdom
Philosophy & Public AffairsUnited States
Anthropological TheoryUnited States
AnthropologicaCanada
European SocietiesGermany
Comparative SociologyUnited States
Politics & SocietyUnited States
Journal of Theoretical PoliticsUnited States
Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary Historyrelative toEuropean Journal of SociologyUnited StatesEuropean Journal of Sociology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
European Journal of Sociology · 1×
×0.81k/1kDEMOG
×1.3532/399HEALT
×1.32k/1kEE
×1.0651/641GS
×0.23k/11kSPS
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
This network shows the impact of papers published in Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History.
About Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
The 664 papers published in Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History in the last decades have received a total of 6.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History usually cover Statistics and Probability (79 papers), Economics and Econometrics (211 papers), Demography (66 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (25 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (216 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Economic and Social Studies (152 papers), Census and Population Estimation (75 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (57 papers), American History and Culture (33 papers), Data Analysis and Archiving (28 papers), demographic modeling and climate adaptation (28 papers), Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (25 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Historical Methods A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History are Andrew J. Abbott, Roberto P. Franzosi, Steven Ruggles, Andrew Abbott, Joseph P. Ferrie, Matthew Sobek, S. Ryan Johansson, David W. Galenson, Michael R. Haines and Larry W. Isaac.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.