Historia Instituciones Documentos

387 papers and 452 indexed citations i.

About

The 387 papers published in Historia Instituciones Documentos in the last decades have received a total of 452 indexed citations. Papers published in Historia Instituciones Documentos usually cover History (317 papers), Archeology (180 papers) and Classics (154 papers) specifically the topics of Medieval and Early Modern Iberia (253 papers), Medieval Iberian Studies (153 papers) and Historical Studies of Medieval Iberia (114 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Historia Instituciones Documentos are Miguel Ángel Ladero Quesada, Manuel González Jiménez, Bartolomé Clavero Salvador, Francisco Tomás y Valiente, M. T. Beltrán, C. J. Bishko, Emilio Martín Gutiérrez, Klaus Wagner, María Mercedes and José María García Marín.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Historia Instituciones Documentos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Historia Instituciones Documentos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Historia Instituciones Documentos.

Countries where authors publish in Historia Instituciones Documentos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Historia Instituciones Documentos. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Historia Instituciones Documentos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Historia Instituciones Documentos more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025