Heart Failure Clinics

949 papers and 13.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 949 papers published in Heart Failure Clinics in the last decades have received a total of 13.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Heart Failure Clinics usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (769 papers), Surgery (196 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (120 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (311 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (308 papers) and Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies (143 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Heart Failure Clinics are Edward G. Lakatta, James B. Strait, Barry A. Borlaug, David A. Kass, Michael W. Rich, Jeffrey A. Towbin, Jagat Narula, Dalane W. Kitzman, Partho P. Sengupta and Kumar Dharmarajan.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Heart Failure Clinics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Heart Failure Clinics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Heart Failure Clinics.

Countries where authors publish in Heart Failure Clinics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Heart Failure Clinics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Heart Failure Clinics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heart Failure Clinics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025