Journal of Family Therapy

1.2k papers and 16.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Journal of Family Therapy in the last decades have received a total of 16.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Family Therapy usually cover Clinical Psychology (1.1k papers), Social Psychology (520 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (164 papers) specifically the topics of Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (726 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (314 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (305 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Family Therapy are David H. Olson, Alan Carr, Michael Rutter, Ivan Eisler, John Byng‐Hall, Glenn Larner, Charlotte Burck, Peter Stratton, Carmel Flaskas and Rudi Dallos.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Family Therapy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Family Therapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Family Therapy.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Family Therapy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Family Therapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Family Therapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Family Therapy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025