Modern Physics Letters A

9.6k papers and 103.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 9.6k papers published in Modern Physics Letters A in the last decades have received a total of 103.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Modern Physics Letters A usually cover Nuclear and High Energy Physics (6.7k papers), Astronomy and Astrophysics (4.0k papers) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (2.7k papers) specifically the topics of Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (3.8k papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (3.5k papers) and Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (2.6k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Modern Physics Letters A are A. M. Polyakov, Ernest Ma, François David, Ashoke Sen, Robert G. Leigh, Cumrun Vafa, Τ. Padmanabhan, M. Sharif, A. B. Zamolodchikov and Sergei D. Odintsov.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Modern Physics Letters A

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Modern Physics Letters A. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Modern Physics Letters A.

Countries where authors publish in Modern Physics Letters A

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Modern Physics Letters A. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Modern Physics Letters A with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Modern Physics Letters A more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025