Global Change Peace & Security

434 papers and 2.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 434 papers published in Global Change Peace & Security in the last decades have received a total of 2.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Global Change Peace & Security usually cover Sociology and Political Science (227 papers), Political Science and International Relations (193 papers) and Development (29 papers) specifically the topics of Peacebuilding and International Security (66 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (49 papers) and International Relations and Foreign Policy (31 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Global Change Peace & Security are Melinda Rankin, Matthew Sussex, J. E. King, Andrew Linklater, Peter Christoff, Claire‐Jehanne Dubouloz, Mark Chou, Alex Wilner, Kempe Ronald Hope and Mike Bourne.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Global Change Peace & Security

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Global Change Peace & Security. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Global Change Peace & Security.

Countries where authors publish in Global Change Peace & Security

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Global Change Peace & Security. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Global Change Peace & Security with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Global Change Peace & Security more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025