Mark Chou

625 citations
49 papers · 304 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Chou

43 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers

Mark Chou
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Political Science and International Relations 149
  • Communication 37
  • Development 16
  • Sociology and Political Science 186
  • Public Administration 12
Replace Katarzyna Jezierska with:
Katarzyna Jezierska Sweden
Daniel de Kadt United States
María Pilar García‐Guadilla Venezuela
Christopher Heurlin United States
Christopher Daase Germany
Steve Tsang United Kingdom
Rachel Busbridge Australia
Britta Baumgarten Germany
Simin Fadaee United Kingdom
Nina P. Halpern United States
Mark Chou relative to Katarzyna Jezierska Sweden Katarzyna Jezierska's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
Katarzyna Jezierska · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Chou

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Chou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Chou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Chou more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Chou

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Chou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Chou. The network helps show where Mark Chou may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Mark Chou, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Chou Line = papers co-authored together Mark Chou links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201146
2 202140
3 202018
4 202015
5
Forbidden fruit: Counterfactuals and international relations
201013
6
Young People, Citizenship and Political Participation: Combating Civic Deficit?
201713
7 201612
8 202210
9 20139
10 20148
11 20138
12 20198
13 20208
14 20207
15 20156
16 20156
17 20146
18 20115
19 20165
20 20145

About Mark Chou

Mark Chou is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Communication, Urban Studies and Anthropology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 304 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (7 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (6 papers), Social Media and Politics (4 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (4 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (4 papers), Asian Studies and History (3 papers) and Socioeconomic Development in Asia (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (149 citations), Communication (37 citations), Development (16 citations), Sociology and Political Science (186 citations) and Public Administration (12 citations). Mark Chou has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Rachel Busbridge, Benjamin Moffitt, Jean-Paul Gagnon, Roland Bleiker, Lesley Pruitt, Catherine Hartung, Chengxin Pan, Michael Picheny, Alex Xiao and Leda Sarı. Their work appears in journals such as Urban Affairs Review, Australian Journal Of International Affairs, Policy Studies, PS Political Science & Politics and Democratization.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact