Mark Chou

681 citations
50 papers · 368 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Chou

44 papers receiving 309 citations

Peers

Mark Chou
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Political Science and International Relations 174
  • Communication 38
  • Development 19
  • Sociology and Political Science 211
  • Public Administration 12
Replace Yanqi Tong with:
Yanqi Tong United States
Jeffrey Flynn United States
Adriano Codato Brazil
Marina Svensson Sweden
Bridget Welsh Australia
Alfredo Joignant Chile
Ali Bilgiç United Kingdom
Roman Krznaric United Kingdom
Sofía Donoso Chile
Reinoud Leenders Netherlands
Mark Chou relative to Yanqi Tong United States Yanqi Tong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×
Yanqi Tong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Chou

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Chou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Chou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Chou more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Chou

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Chou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Chou. The network helps show where Mark Chou may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Mark Chou, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Chou Line = papers co-authored together Mark Chou links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201154
2 202150
3
Forbidden fruit: Counterfactuals and international relations
201020
4 202018
5 202017
6 202216
7
Young people, citizenship and political participation : combating civic deficit?
201716
8 201613
9 201410
10 201310
11 20209
12 20139
13
Democracy Against Itself: Sustaining an Unsustainable Idea
20148
14 20198
15 20208
16 20168
17 20168
18 20128
19 20157
20 20156

About Mark Chou

Mark Chou is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies, Communication and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 50 papers that have together received 368 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (7 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (6 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (4 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Social Media and Politics (4 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (4 papers), Theatre and Performance Studies (3 papers) and Foucault, Power, and Ethics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (174 citations), Communication (38 citations), Development (19 citations), Sociology and Political Science (211 citations) and Public Administration (12 citations). Mark Chou has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Taiwan and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Rachel Busbridge, Benjamin Moffitt, Jean-Paul Gagnon, Lesley J. Pruitt, Roland Bleiker, Catherine Hartung, Chengxin Pan, Leda Sarı, Michael Picheny and Xiaohui Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Urban Affairs Review, Urban Policy and Research, Political Studies Review, Democratization and PS Political Science & Politics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact