Games for Health Journal

665 papers and 10.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 665 papers published in Games for Health Journal in the last decades have received a total of 10.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Games for Health Journal usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (199 papers), Psychiatry and Mental health (134 papers) and Physiology (121 papers) specifically the topics of Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (114 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (106 papers) and Physical Activity and Health (103 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Games for Health Journal are Tom Baranowski, Amy Shirong Lu, Elizabeth Lyons, Debbe Thompson, Richard Buday, Amanda E. Staiano, Pamela M. Kato, Hadi Kharrazi, Ricardo Borges Viana and Claudio André Barbosa de Lira.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Games for Health Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Games for Health Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Games for Health Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Games for Health Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Games for Health Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Games for Health Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Games for Health Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025