Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews

1.1k papers and 62.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews in the last decades have received a total of 62.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews usually cover Physiology (316 papers), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (180 papers) and Molecular Biology (174 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (154 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (137 papers) and Sports Performance and Training (123 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews are D. G. Sale, Edward F. Coyle, Robert M. Malina, John R. Halliwill, David W. Dunstan, Neville Owen, Charles E. Matthews, Dario Farina, Geneviève N. Healy and Carl Gans.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews.

Countries where authors publish in Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025