Géotechnique Letters

613 papers and 9.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 613 papers published in Géotechnique Letters in the last decades have received a total of 9.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Géotechnique Letters usually cover Civil and Structural Engineering (506 papers), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (150 papers) and Mechanics of Materials (140 papers) specifically the topics of Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics (259 papers), Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures (219 papers) and Soil and Unsaturated Flow (163 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Géotechnique Letters are Charles Wang Wai Ng, Gioacchino Viggiani, C. M. Martin, G. R. McDowell, J. David Frost, Alejandro Martínez, Nilo César Consoli, Adrian R. Russell, Susan Gourvenec and M. R. Coop.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Géotechnique Letters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Géotechnique Letters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Géotechnique Letters.

Countries where authors publish in Géotechnique Letters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Géotechnique Letters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Géotechnique Letters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Géotechnique Letters more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025