This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cartilage. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cartilage with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cartilage more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Cartilage. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cartilage.
About Cartilage
The 1.2k papers published in Cartilage in the last decades have received a total of 20.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Cartilage usually cover Rheumatology (678 papers), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (107 papers), Urology (63 papers), Surgery (271 papers) and Equine (7 papers) specifically the topics of Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (659 papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (172 papers), Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (118 papers), Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (72 papers), Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments (63 papers), Foot and Ankle Surgery (46 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (41 papers) and Bone and Joint Diseases (32 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cartilage are Giuseppe Filardo, John G. Kennedy, Christopher D. Murawski, Alberto W. Gobbi, Andreas H. Gomoll, Stefano Zaffagnini, Brian J. Cole, Christian Candrian, Kai Mithoefer and Casper Bindzus Foldager.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.