This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Geobiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Geobiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geobiology more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Geobiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Geobiology.
About Geobiology
The 849 papers published in Geobiology in the last decades have received a total of 33.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Geobiology usually cover Paleontology (408 papers), Geochemistry and Petrology (216 papers), Environmental Chemistry (273 papers), Atmospheric Science (230 papers) and Oceanography (139 papers) specifically the topics of Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (402 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (225 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (224 papers), Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (220 papers), Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis (204 papers), Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis (98 papers), Marine Biology and Ecology Research (73 papers) and Marine and coastal ecosystems (68 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Geobiology are Andreas Kappler, Andrew H. Knoll, Robert Riding, Roger E. Summons, Carrine E. Blank, Derek R. Lovley, Jan P. Amend, Kurt O. Konhauser, Tori M. Hoehler and Patricia Sánchez‐Baracaldo.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.