Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde

4.5k papers and 18.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 4.5k papers published in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde in the last decades have received a total of 18.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde usually cover Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (974 papers), Obstetrics and Gynecology (846 papers) and Surgery (751 papers) specifically the topics of Medical and Health Sciences Research (285 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (264 papers) and Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (263 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde are K. Semm, Tanja Fehm, Matthias David, Werner Rath, M. Voigt, K. Schneider, K Jährig, Matthias W. Beckmann, Sara Y. Brucker and Peter A. Fasching.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.

Countries where authors publish in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025