Journal of Pharmacy Practice

2.1k papers and 13.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.1k papers published in Journal of Pharmacy Practice in the last decades have received a total of 13.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Pharmacy Practice usually cover Geriatrics and Gerontology (384 papers), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (311 papers) and Pharmacology (246 papers) specifically the topics of Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (383 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (147 papers) and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (124 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Pharmacy Practice are Peter Anderson, Shyh Poh Teo, David M. Aronoff, Daryl D. DePestel, Richard N. Herrier, Jonathan Edwards, Kurt A. Wargo, W. Klugh Kennedy, Michael W. Jann and Gaylord Lopez.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Pharmacy Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Pharmacy Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Pharmacy Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Pharmacy Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Pharmacy Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Pharmacy Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Pharmacy Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025