Forests Trees and Livelihoods

6.8k citations
482 papers · · active since 1999

Impact in

  • Forestry top 1%
    • African Botany and Ecology Studies
    • Forest Ecology and Conservation
    • Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
    • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
    • Forest Management and Policy
    • Land Use and Ecosystem Services

Papers in

    • African Botany and Ecology Studies 145
    • Forest Ecology and Conservation 90
    • Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems 31
    • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management 181
    • Forest Management and Policy 39

Forests Trees and Livelihoods

456 papers receiving 6.2k citations

Peers

Forests Trees and Livelihoods
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Forestry 2.5k
  • Global and Planetary Change 2.5k
  • Horticulture 66
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 713
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 550
Replace Small-scale Forestry with:
Small-scale Forestry United States
Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems United States
Tropical Ecology India
Carbon Balance and Management United States
International Journal of Forestry Research United States
Agriculture & Food Security Ethiopia
International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability United States
Food and Energy Security China
NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences Netherlands
Environmental Evidence United Kingdom
Forests Trees and Livelihoods relative to Small-scale Forestry United States Small-scale Forestry's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.6×
Small-scale Forestry · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Forests Trees and Livelihoods

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Forests Trees and Livelihoods. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Forests Trees and Livelihoods with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forests Trees and Livelihoods more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Forests Trees and Livelihoods

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Forests Trees and Livelihoods. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Forests Trees and Livelihoods.

About Forests Trees and Livelihoods

The 482 papers published in Forests Trees and Livelihoods in the last decades have received a total of 6.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Forests Trees and Livelihoods usually cover Forestry (219 papers), Global and Planetary Change (202 papers), Horticulture (5 papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (44 papers) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (36 papers) specifically the topics of Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (181 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (145 papers), Forest Ecology and Conservation (90 papers), Forest Management and Policy (39 papers), Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies (39 papers), Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems (31 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (22 papers) and Forest ecology and management (21 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Forests Trees and Livelihoods are K. Freerk Wiersum, Demel Teketay, Z. Tchoundjeu, Mirjam A. F. Ros-Tonen, Hubert de Foresta, Philip Philip, Michelle Linda Cocks, Ann Degrande, Mesele Negash and Patrice Levang.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact