Frontiers in Physiology

16.2k papers and 331.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 16.2k papers published in Frontiers in Physiology in the last decades have received a total of 331.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Frontiers in Physiology usually cover Molecular Biology (4.6k papers), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (3.5k papers) and Physiology (2.9k papers) specifically the topics of Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (1.1k papers), Sports Performance and Training (1.1k papers) and Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (1.1k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Frontiers in Physiology are George E. Billman, Carlos Rosales, Espen A. F. Ihlen, Martin Buchheit, Sengottayan Senthil‐Nathan, Roberto Tuberosa, Bruce J. West, Paolo Bernardi, Billy Sperlich and Heimo Mairbäurl.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Frontiers in Physiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Frontiers in Physiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Frontiers in Physiology.

Countries where authors publish in Frontiers in Physiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Frontiers in Physiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Frontiers in Physiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frontiers in Physiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025