Okajimas Folia Anatomica Japonica

1.7k papers and 10.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in Okajimas Folia Anatomica Japonica in the last decades have received a total of 10.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Okajimas Folia Anatomica Japonica usually cover Molecular Biology (330 papers), Surgery (308 papers) and Physiology (184 papers) specifically the topics of Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies (147 papers), Peripheral Nerve Disorders (59 papers) and Animal Nutrition and Physiology (49 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Okajimas Folia Anatomica Japonica are Shoichi EMURA, Huayue Chen, Masaru Mori, Toshihiko Okumura, Toshio Ito, Noboru GOTO, Yoshikuni Ohta, Shízuko Shoumura, Daisuke Hayakawa and Ryohei Honjin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Okajimas Folia Anatomica Japonica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Okajimas Folia Anatomica Japonica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Okajimas Folia Anatomica Japonica.

Countries where authors publish in Okajimas Folia Anatomica Japonica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Okajimas Folia Anatomica Japonica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Okajimas Folia Anatomica Japonica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Okajimas Folia Anatomica Japonica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025