M. O’Brien

41 papers receiving 723 citations

Peers

M. O’Brien
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Instrumentation 300
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 26
  • Biophysics 88
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 42
  • Ophthalmology 104
Replace Geoffrey S. Kinsey with:
Geoffrey S. Kinsey United States
Zygmunt Mierczyk Poland
Daniel Feuermann Israel
Ashraf F. El-Sherif Egypt
Warren J. Smith United Kingdom
Guang Yuan China
Akihiro Watanabe Japan
Jiajian Zhu China
Zhimeng Li China
Xin Chen United States
M. O’Brien relative to Geoffrey S. Kinsey United States Geoffrey S. Kinsey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
Geoffrey S. Kinsey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. O’Brien

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. O’Brien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. O’Brien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. O’Brien more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. O’Brien

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. O’Brien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. O’Brien. The network helps show where M. O’Brien may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. O’Brien, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. O’Brien Line = papers co-authored together M. O’Brien links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002198
2 201167
3 201061
4 200361
5 201146
6 201245
7 200137
8 200430
9 200324
10 200421
11 201420
12 200520
13 198918
14 199717
15 201815
16 200613
17 201210
18 19888
19 19948
20 19968

About M. O’Brien

M. O’Brien is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Mechanical Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Process Chemistry and Technology and Catalysis, having authored 44 papers that have together received 815 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (7 papers), Advanced Optical Sensing Technologies (7 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (4 papers), Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics (4 papers), Mineral Processing and Grinding (4 papers), Granular flow and fluidized beds (3 papers), Ionic liquids properties and applications (3 papers) and Sugarcane Cultivation and Processing (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (300 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (26 citations), Biophysics (88 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (42 citations) and Ophthalmology (104 citations). M. O’Brien has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Perry, James Mooney, Daniel G. Fouche, Brian F. Aull, Marius A. Albotǎ, John J. Zayhowski, Robert M. Enick, Richard M. Heinrichs, Robert R. Carlson and B. Firth. Their work appears in journals such as Energy & Fuels, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Materials Science and Engineering A, Fuel and IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact