Folia Cryptogamica Estonica

204 papers and 1.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 204 papers published in Folia Cryptogamica Estonica in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Folia Cryptogamica Estonica usually cover Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (191 papers), Plant Science (169 papers) and Insect Science (32 papers) specifically the topics of Lichen and fungal ecology (182 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (123 papers) and Bryophyte Studies and Records (110 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Folia Cryptogamica Estonica are Mikhail P. Zhurbenko, I. S. Stepanchikova, D. E. Himelbrant, Martin Kukwa, Inga Jüriado, Anna Mežaka, Tiina Randlane, G. P. Urbanavichus, Jurga Motiejūnaitė and Eric Steen Hansen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Folia Cryptogamica Estonica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Folia Cryptogamica Estonica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Folia Cryptogamica Estonica.

Countries where authors publish in Folia Cryptogamica Estonica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Folia Cryptogamica Estonica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Folia Cryptogamica Estonica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Folia Cryptogamica Estonica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025