Fixed Point Theory

299 papers and 1.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 299 papers published in Fixed Point Theory in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Fixed Point Theory usually cover Geometry and Topology (203 papers), Computational Theory and Mathematics (135 papers) and Applied Mathematics (113 papers) specifically the topics of Fixed Point Theorems Analysis (200 papers), Optimization and Variational Analysis (122 papers) and Nonlinear Differential Equations Analysis (92 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Fixed Point Theory are Adrian Petruşel, Lu-Chuan Ceng, Jen‐Chih Yao, Mohammad Imdad, Yonghong Yao, Aftab Alam, Xiaolong Qin, Ching‐Feng Wen, Manuel De la Sen and M‎. ‎Eshaghi Gordji.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Fixed Point Theory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Fixed Point Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Fixed Point Theory.

Countries where authors publish in Fixed Point Theory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Fixed Point Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Fixed Point Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fixed Point Theory more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025